Case Study 7 - The Separating Couple

Background

  • Mr & Mrs C were both aged 61, in good health, with three grown up children. Mr C had a British Petroleum pension in payment of £18,000 per annum with provision to Mrs C on death of £15,000 per annum (83%).

Concerns

  • How to provide an adequate split of pension assets which was fair to both sides.
  • No shadow membership available.
  • CETV – poor value to both sides.

What We Did

  • Requested an actuarial report which stated that the share needed to be 63%:37% in Mrs C’s favour to equalise gross pension in payment of £7,000 each.
  • We advised on the clients on their options including the costs of implementing a pension sharing order and the consequences of this approach.

The Results

  • Clients decided not divorce but legally separated.
  • Mr C retained his higher pension.
  • Mrs C retained her 83% benefit on Mr C’s demise.
  • Both would have been short changed by a sharing order.
  • Novel and innovative solution.

What Our Clients Say...

He delivered a thought provoking and eye opening session...
I asked Phil to present at the Family Mediators Association Conference on Pension Freedoms within the context of divorce and financial settlements. He delivered a thought provoking and eye opening session full of ideas and case studies. The feedback I received from our delegates was extremely positive. If you are struggling with the challenges that pension freedoms throw up then Phil’s your man.
Beverley Sayers - Chair - Family Mediators Association

Do You Have A Question Related To This Case Study?

Use the form below to ask me anything about this case study. I promise that anything you say will be 100% confidential.

  • Some of our Accreditations & Awards