Pension Sharing – Equality of capital versus Equality of Income

Posted October 21st, 2010

I am often asked by clients what is the difference between equality of capital and equality of income calculations. And why is it important to ensure that before instructing an actuary each party understands what the calculations might mean for them.

To illustrate this issue I have provided explanations of each calculation below together with a worked example.

Equality of capital

This is the simplest approach to sharing pensions. It often mirrors what has happened elsewhere in deciding how to split the other marital assets. So, lets assume that a 50:50 division of capital is agreed.

Example 1 – Equality of Capital (50:50) Male aged 65 / Female age 60

Before

Male CETV – £200,000
Female CETV – £0

After

Male CETV – £100,000
Female CETV – £100,000

Male – annuity income – £6,535 per annum*
Female – annuity income – £5,687 per annum*

(Source: The Exchange – October 2010)
*Annuity purchased is on a single life basis, 5 year guarantee with no escalation.

Result

So we have equality of capital but not equality of outcome / income.

Equality of income – same clients

This calculation attempts to rectify the outcome detailed above. It takes into account the client’s ages, health (if relevant) but most importantly the difference in sex! The key point here is that it costs more pension cash equivalent transfer value (cetv) to provide a woman with the same amount of income than it does a man.

 Example 2 – Equality of Income

Before

Male CETV – £200,000
Female CETV – £0

Share needed

Male CETV – £93,050
Female CETV – £106,950

Annuity income now

Male annuity income – £6,080 per annum*
Female annuity income – £6,082 per annum*

(Source: The Exchange – October 2010)
*Annuity purchased is on a single life basis, 5 year guarantee with no escalation.

Result

So by sharing pension 46.53%:53.48% the client’s have equality of income.

This is a very simplistic case but I think it illustrates the issue nicely. Where the pensions involved are final salary or defined benefit, the client is in ill health or there are major differences in their ages (i.e. 10 years plus) then these issues complicate the calculations and it is necessary to get professional actuarial advice.

Should you wish to discuss equality of capital versus equality of income, please contact us here.

Pensions and divorce – Ill health

Posted August 9th, 2010

An issue to be aware of when considering ill health in divorce matters, is its potential impact on pension asset values.

It can reasonably be argued that based on longevity a pension asset in the hands of someone with a shorter life expectancy has less value than it would in the possession of someone with an average life expectancy. It is anticipated that the pension income will be paid out for a shorter period of time.

In a divorce, it would seem an appropriate approach to look at pension sharing and perhaps consider a greater proportion of the pension be shared with the spouse who is in good health. This may enable the spouse in poor health to retain more non pension asset (which could die with them) and pass this wealth down through their family. For completeness, a review of the death benefits available should also be undertaken.

For more information on this and how life expectancy affects pension valuations and other aspects of your finances on divorce, please contact us on 0800 092 1229 or email advice@thedivorceifa.co.uk