Posted December 17th, 2010
Sometimes when dealing with pensions it is easy to miss the fact that additional contributions have been paid. This is because not all additional voluntary contributions (AVCs) will be reflected in the cash equivalent transfer value (CETV) being quoted.
Where AVCs are being paid on a money purchase basis they will often accrue in a separate insurance company policy alongside the main scheme benefits.
So, my advice when dealing with a final salary scheme on pension sharing is to ask the question – have any AVCs been paid? It has not been unusual for an extra £30,000 plus of CETV to account for the AVCs and like the main scheme benefits they are able to have a pension sharing order placed against them.
If you would like to discuss pension sharing and AVCs, please contact me on 0800 092 1220 or send me an email – phil@thedivorceifa.co.uk
Tags: Accrue, Additional Contributions, Additional Voluntary Contributions, AVCs, Cash Equivalent Transfer Value, CETVs, Final Salary Scheme, Final Salary Scheme on Pension Sharing, Insurance Company Policy, Main Scheme Benefits, Money Purchase, Money Purchase Basis, Pension Sharing, Pension Sharing and AVCs, pension sharing order | Posted in Pension Sharing |
Comments: No Comments yet!
Posted October 9th, 2010
The Public Sector Pension schemes – (NHS, Police, Civil Service, Local Government, Teachers, Armed Forces) are changing the way that they increase pensions in payment and revalue pensions in deferment from being linked to the Retail Price Index (RPI) to the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
RPI and CPI are measures of UK domestic inflation which are calculated by collecting a sample of prices for a selection of goods and services.
The major difference between the two measures is that RPI includes mortgage interest costs but CPI does not. Historically, this has meant that CPI has increased at a lower rate than RPI and it is therefore, expected to do so in the future.
In pension on divorce cases this change will potentially have two main knock on effects.
- It will have a negative impact on cash equivalent transfer values – the actuarial experts I have spoken with estimate that CETVs will be potentially up to 20% to 25% lower in some situations.
- It will mean that in retirement the amount of revaluation that each parties’ pension will receive will be lower.
If you would like more information on how these changes might affect you, please get in touch.
Tags: Armed Foreces, Cash Equivalent Transfer Value, CETV, CETVs, Civil Service, Consumer Price Index, Consumer Prices, CPI, Divorce, inflation, Local Government, NHS, Pension, Pension on Divorce, Pensions, pensions in deferment, pensions in payment, Pensions on divorce, Police, Public Sector Pension Schemes, Retail Prices, Retail Prices Index, revalue pensions, RPI, Teachers | Posted in Pensions & divorce |
Comments: No Comments yet!
Posted October 4th, 2010
Whilst the NHS call centre and website are saying it could be up to next April before the new cash equivalent transfer values (CETVs) / Cash Equivalent Of Benefit calculations (CTVs) commence again, I understand that the new CPI factors are now starting to become available for the Public Sector Schemes.
The Fire Service and NHS pension scheme have confirmed receipt and they will be testing their systems over the next two weeks. The other schemes – Local Government Pension Scheme, Police Pension Scheme, Armed Forces- are expected over the coming weeks.
It is hoped that the end of this embargo (see here) will be soon and we can return to normal with requesting public sector pension transfer values.
If this is something that is currently affecting you, please feel free to contact us.
Tags: Armed Forces, Cash Equivalent of Benefit, Cash Equivalent Transfer Value, CETV, CETVs, CPI, CPI Factors, CTV, CTVs, Embargo, Fire Service, Local Government, Local Government Pension Scheme, NHS Pension, NHS Pension Scheme, Pension Transfer Values, Police Pension Scheme, Public Sector, Public Sector Pension Schemes | Posted in Cash Equivalent Transfer Values |
Comments: No Comments yet!
Posted April 6th, 2010
Clients often worry about whether the cash equivalent transfer value (CETV) they have been quoted represents fair value. It should be noted that there can be two types of challenge to the fairness of the CETV but in many cases, such challenges will have a low chance of success.
1. Does the CETV itself represent fair value
It is important to understand that the CETV may seriously undervalue the total pension benefits due to a variety of reasons (for example, it may not cover all the pension benefits or it may have been discounted due to the state of the scheme’s funding). It is therefore, possible to argue that another (higher) figure should be used which represents a fairer valuation.
The CETV itself cannot be changed and so a higher proportion of pension benefits may be shared or other marital assets may be distributed more favourably.
To prove undervaluation it would be necessary to present expert actuarial opinion and to negotiate strongly on this point. This should not to be confused with..
2. Does the split of the CETV represent fair value
Where equality of outcome is desirable (i.e. both parties want the same income at an agreed retirement age) a 50:50 split of the pension assets may not represent fair value.
Here a split in favour of the wife may be greater than 50% to take account of a number of factors, but mainly that women have a greater life expectancy than men.
Of course, it should be noted that it is likely that the final benefits received will not represent the same values quoted due to the time lag between the valuation date and the valuation day.
If you would like to know whether your CETV represents fair value, please call or email me for a confidential chat.
Tags: 50:50 split, Cash Equivalent Transfer Value, CETV, CETVs, Discounted, Fair value, Fairer valuation, Pension, Pension Benefits, Scheme Funding, Split, Undervalue, Valuation Date, Valuation Day | Posted in Transfer values |
Comments: No Comments yet!
