Pension Sharing – Equality of capital versus Equality of Income

Posted October 21st, 2010

I am often asked by clients what is the difference between equality of capital and equality of income calculations. And why is it important to ensure that before instructing an actuary each party understands what the calculations might mean for them.

To illustrate this issue I have provided explanations of each calculation below together with a worked example.

Equality of capital

This is the simplest approach to sharing pensions. It often mirrors what has happened elsewhere in deciding how to split the other marital assets. So, lets assume that a 50:50 division of capital is agreed.

Example 1 – Equality of Capital (50:50) Male aged 65 / Female age 60

Before

Male CETV – £200,000
Female CETV – £0

After

Male CETV – £100,000
Female CETV – £100,000

Male – annuity income – £6,535 per annum*
Female – annuity income – £5,687 per annum*

(Source: The Exchange – October 2010)
*Annuity purchased is on a single life basis, 5 year guarantee with no escalation.

Result

So we have equality of capital but not equality of outcome / income.

Equality of income – same clients

This calculation attempts to rectify the outcome detailed above. It takes into account the client’s ages, health (if relevant) but most importantly the difference in sex! The key point here is that it costs more pension cash equivalent transfer value (cetv) to provide a woman with the same amount of income than it does a man.

 Example 2 – Equality of Income

Before

Male CETV – £200,000
Female CETV – £0

Share needed

Male CETV – £93,050
Female CETV – £106,950

Annuity income now

Male annuity income – £6,080 per annum*
Female annuity income – £6,082 per annum*

(Source: The Exchange – October 2010)
*Annuity purchased is on a single life basis, 5 year guarantee with no escalation.

Result

So by sharing pension 46.53%:53.48% the client’s have equality of income.

This is a very simplistic case but I think it illustrates the issue nicely. Where the pensions involved are final salary or defined benefit, the client is in ill health or there are major differences in their ages (i.e. 10 years plus) then these issues complicate the calculations and it is necessary to get professional actuarial advice.

Should you wish to discuss equality of capital versus equality of income, please contact us here.

How is a pension asset valued?

Posted March 19th, 2010

The prescribed method of valuing a pension for divorce purposes, whether the pension rights are to be subject to pension offsetting, pension attachment or pension sharing is the Cash Equivalent Transfer Value (CETV).

The CETV is the capital value of the pension rights as calculated by the scheme actuary or the pension provider. This valuation method is used where the pension is being accrued or is not yet in payment.

Where the pension is actually in payment, a different valuation basis needs to be used. This is the cash equivalent of benefit (CEB) calculation and it does give a capital value which can be shared, offset or earmarked. If you google the Martin-Dye v. Martin-Dye judgement you can find more information out on this valuation basis.

Neither calculation (CETV or CEB) is subject to standard actuarial methods and each defined benefit scheme will use a different valuation basis.

I cannot emphasis how important understanding this aspect of pensions and divorce is to maximising your settlement. Scrutinise the value to decide whether it represents fair value.

If you need further assistance with your CETV or CEB feel free to contact me for a confidential chat.
phil@thedivorceifa.co.uk or 0800 092 1229