Posted December 20th, 2010
When appointing an expert on pension sharing matters it is always worth looking at whether the report you will receive is from an authorised source or not.
For pension sharing reports I always work in conjunction with an actuary as I always feel comforted by the fact that the actuarial assumptions being used are sensible, well thought out and take account of future changes, in for example, annuity rates and life expectancy. And if I have a problem I have recourse to the Institute of Actuaries.
So my advice when appointing is to check the credentials of who will be doing the report, what assumptions they will use and what recourse you have if things go wrong.
If this affects you or you are looking to instruct an pension expert – please contact me on 0800 092 1220 or send me an email – phil@thedivorceifa.co.uk
Tags: Actuarial Assumptions, Actuary, Annuity rates, Authorised, Expert, Expert on Pension Sharing, Life expectancy, Pension, Pension Expert, Pension Sharing, Pension Sharing Reports | Posted in Pension Sharing |
Comments: No Comments yet!
Posted October 21st, 2010
I am often asked by clients what is the difference between equality of capital and equality of income calculations. And why is it important to ensure that before instructing an actuary each party understands what the calculations might mean for them.
To illustrate this issue I have provided explanations of each calculation below together with a worked example.
Equality of capital
This is the simplest approach to sharing pensions. It often mirrors what has happened elsewhere in deciding how to split the other marital assets. So, lets assume that a 50:50 division of capital is agreed.
Example 1 – Equality of Capital (50:50) Male aged 65 / Female age 60
Before
Male CETV – £200,000
Female CETV – £0
After
Male CETV – £100,000
Female CETV – £100,000
Male – annuity income – £6,535 per annum*
Female – annuity income – £5,687 per annum*
(Source: The Exchange – October 2010)
*Annuity purchased is on a single life basis, 5 year guarantee with no escalation.
Result
So we have equality of capital but not equality of outcome / income.
Equality of income – same clients
This calculation attempts to rectify the outcome detailed above. It takes into account the client’s ages, health (if relevant) but most importantly the difference in sex! The key point here is that it costs more pension cash equivalent transfer value (cetv) to provide a woman with the same amount of income than it does a man.
Example 2 – Equality of Income
Before
Male CETV – £200,000
Female CETV – £0
Share needed
Male CETV – £93,050
Female CETV – £106,950
Annuity income now
Male annuity income – £6,080 per annum*
Female annuity income – £6,082 per annum*
(Source: The Exchange – October 2010)
*Annuity purchased is on a single life basis, 5 year guarantee with no escalation.
Result
So by sharing pension 46.53%:53.48% the client’s have equality of income.
This is a very simplistic case but I think it illustrates the issue nicely. Where the pensions involved are final salary or defined benefit, the client is in ill health or there are major differences in their ages (i.e. 10 years plus) then these issues complicate the calculations and it is necessary to get professional actuarial advice.
Should you wish to discuss equality of capital versus equality of income, please contact us here.
Tags: 5 year guarantee, 50:50, Actuary, Annuity, Calculation, Cash Equivalent Transfer Value, CETV, Defined Benefit, Division of Capital, Equality of Capital, Equality of Income, Equality of Outcome, Final Salary, Ill Health, Marital Assets, no escalation, Pension, Pension Sharing, Sharing Pension, Sharing Pensions, Single Life Basis | Posted in Pension Sharing |
Comments: No Comments yet!
Posted September 28th, 2010
The NHS has just published its schedule of charges for January 2011 onwards.
It makes interesting reading especially the near 600% increase for implementing a pension sharing order. The charge to implement a pension sharing order goes up to £2,760 from £393.62 (an increase of over 600%).
For full details on the increase to the pension sharing order costs and their other proposed charges – see here.
With the current embargo on cash equivalent transfer values slowing up divorces involving NHS Pensions (see here) there is now a clear incentive to get the pension sharing order implemented before January 2011.
However, the cash equivalent transfer value or cash equivalent of benefit calculations are not available and there is still no guidance coming from NHS Pensions.
For £50 plus VAT we are able via an actuary to provide an indicative value of the value of NHS Pensions to help negotiations.
I wonder if this is the start of increases across all the Public Sector schemes – Fire, Armed Forces, Police, Local Government and others. Is this just a cynical income raiser for the Government?
If you would like further information please contact us on 0800 092 1229 or email advice@thedivorceifa.co.uk
Tags: Actuary, Cash Equivalent of Benefit, Cash Equivalent Transfer Value, Divorces, Implementing a pension sharing order, NHS, NHS Pensions, pension sharing order, pension sharing order costs, Pension Sharing Orders, Public Sector Schemes, Schedule of Charges | Posted in Pension Sharing |
Comments: No Comments yet!
Posted September 6th, 2010
Pension sharing is a confusing and complicated part of any divorce settlement and there are many issues to be aware of before proceeding. Some examples include:
- The fairness of a cash equivalent transfer values (CETV).
- Internal transfer or external transfer?
- Moving target syndrome?
- Default options.
Therefore, it was a refreshing change to be contacted by a client this week who had received notification from her pension provider (Prudential) that she HAD to take financial advice before they would agree to accept the pension sharing order.
To avoid the pitfalls above it is important to take financial advice from a competent adviser, preferably one who is a Resolution Accredited Independent Financial Adviser (See link here). You may also wish to employ the services of an actuary that advises on pension and divorce cases.
If this is you and you are looking for financial advice on a pension sharing matter or if you require further information, please contact me on 0800 092 1229 or email advice@thedivorceifa.co.uk
Tags: Actuary, Cash Equivalent Transfer Value, CETV, Competent Adviser, Default Option, Default Options, Divorce Settlement, external transfer, Financial Advice, internal transfer, Moving Target Syndrome, Pension and divorce, Pension Provider, Pension Sharing, Pension Sharing Matter, pension sharing order, Prudential, Receiving scheme, Resolution, Resolution Accredited, Resolution Accredited Independent Financial Adviser | Posted in Pension Sharing |
Comments: No Comments yet!
Posted August 20th, 2009
Since 2000, a pension sharing order has been available as an option on divorce. With the ability to achieve a clean break this should be the option of choice for most divorce cases where the pension benefits are significant (and earmarking / offsetting have been discounted).
A lot of focus is rightly given to ensuring that an equitable pension share is achieved and here the use of a suitable actuary is advisable. However, in my opinion, less time is given to the options available once the pension share has been calculated and many clients approach this stage with unnecessary fear and trepidation.
Options
With a pension share there are two options – an internal or external transfer – and either option can have its merits depending upon circumstances.
With an internal transfer the pension does not physically move from the existing scheme but a debit and credit is created to satisfy the pension share. Most importantly, the internal scheme benefits can differ significantly. For example, some final salary schemes offer shadow membership whereby the same defined benefit rights generously apply to the new member whilst others provide poorer value money purchase equivalents.
With an external transfer the fund value of the pension share is physically transferred to a new arrangement in the individual’s name, with the associated issues of understanding the investment and annuity risks involved but having the benefit of control.
Considerations
Here are a few suggested considerations which will assist in deciding which type of transfer is appropriate.
* How flexible is retirement and who decides when retirement can start.
* How much pension income will be payable at retirement and how secure is it.
* How much risk is involved / could my pension fall in value.
* What are the death benefit arrangements and who will ultimately benefit.
* Can future pension contributions be paid.
* What are the charges involved.
If you would like more information on how we deal with pension sharing, please call us on 01204 663904 or contact us by email on advice@thedivorceifa.co.uk
Tags: Actuary, clean break, death benefit, Divorce, earmarking, external transfer, Final Salary, internal transfer, offsetting, Pension, pension share, pension sharing order | Posted in Pension Sharing |
Comments: No Comments yet!
Posted July 9th, 2009
I have attached below a very useful checklist for lawyers to use when working with clients with Public Sector pensions.
Public Sector Scheme Checklist
This checklist has been produced by Bradshaw Dixon Moore Limited and they have kindly given me permission to post it here. You can access further information on their actuarial services below:
www.bradshawdixonmoore.com
In addition, they also provide useful information and comment on divorce matters at:
www.ancillaryactuary.co.uk
If you require further information on The Divorce IFA, please call us on 01204 663904 or by email advice@thedivorceifa.co.uk
Tags: Actuary, Bradshaw Dixon Moore, Final Salary, Pension, Public Sector | Posted in Actuary |
Comments: No Comments yet!
